Client feedback arrives structured, attached to the right item, and already turned into a revision brief your team can act on. The vague "can you make it pop" comment becomes a specific request with the item, the version, and the reason recorded beside it.
The Testimonial Portal App is a live Taskade Genesis app embedded on this page, and it is the nearest thing in the gallery to a client feedback capture surface. Run through how it collects and displays responses, then choose "Use this app" to clone it in about ten seconds and reshape the questions for your revision process.
The build gives you a feedback surface that produces usable input. Instead of a free-text box, the client answers a short set of prompts against the specific deliverable: what works, what does not, what must change before approval, and what is a nice-to-have. Each response is attached to the item and the version. An agent then groups the comments into a revision brief with the must-change items separated from the preferences, which is exactly the distinction that decides whether a project stays on schedule.
The must-change and nice-to-have split is the whole point. Most schedule overruns in client work come from treating a preference as a requirement, because nobody asked which it was. Making that a required question, per deliverable, converts a vague review into a decision. A client saying the headline must change before we can approve, and separately that they would prefer a warmer photograph, has given your team a scope they can plan around and a preference they can weigh. The same feedback as one paragraph gives them neither.
Workspace DNA closes the loop. Memory keeps every round of feedback against every version, so you can see how the request evolved. Intelligence, powered by 15+ frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and open-weight providers, reads the comments, removes the duplicates, and writes the brief. Execution assigns the revision, notifies the owner, and returns the new version to the client for review.
The loop renders in every layout you need:
- Board view for moving items through feedback, revising, and re-review
- List view for the client's own simple feedback form and history
- Table view for the register of comments, rounds, and outcomes
- Calendar view for feedback deadlines and revision due dates
- Plus Mind Map, Gantt, and Org Chart across the 7 project views
Automations keep the rounds moving. Connect Taskade automations so submitted feedback creates the revision task and notifies the owner, a completed revision returns the item to the client, and a feedback request sitting untouched for three days sends a reminder. With 100+ bidirectional integrations, your design and delivery tools pull assets in, while Slack and email push requests and confirmations out.
Set the round expectation up front. Stating that a deliverable includes two rounds of revision, and tracking rounds on the record, keeps the conversation factual when a third round appears. It is much easier to raise before the work than to negotiate afterwards.
The AI agents in the app carry 34 built-in tools including file analysis and persistent memory. An agent can compare the new version against the recorded must-change items and tell you whether the round actually addressed them before you send it back.
Over time the feedback register becomes useful in its own right. Patterns show up: a deliverable type that always needs two rounds, a reviewer whose comments arrive after the deadline, a brief format that produces fewer surprises. Those are process problems you can fix, and they are invisible when feedback lives in email. Keeping every round attached to the item and the version means the answer to what usually goes wrong here is a question you can actually ask your own data.
Clone the app, invite the team, and the feedback record is yours. Client sign-in is available on Business plans and up, $25/mo billed annually, and App Users is in beta.
Read Version history for tracking rounds, Build a form with logic for the questions, or browse review builds in the Community Gallery. Start at Taskade Genesis. Pair this with Publish a Client Deliverables Approval Queue and Give Clients a Live Project Status Page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why not just let clients leave a comment?
Because unstructured comments produce unclear work. Asking what must change before approval, separately from what would be nice, gives your team a decision instead of a mood.
Can several people on the client side give feedback?
Yes. Collect from each signed-in person and let the agent consolidate the responses, flagging where two reviewers contradict each other so someone can decide.
How do I limit revision rounds?
Count the rounds on the item. When the limit is reached, an automation notifies the account owner so the scope conversation happens before the work does.
Does the client see what happened to their feedback?
Yes. Each comment carries a status, so the client can see what was actioned, what was deferred, and why. That transparency reduces repeat requests.
Can the agent write the revision brief?
Yes. It groups related comments, separates must-change from preference, and writes the brief in the language your team works in rather than the client's.
What about feedback on documents rather than designs?
The same loop works. Attach the document, collect structured responses, and produce the brief. The item type does not change the mechanics.
Can I reuse the feedback questions across clients?
Yes. Keep them as a template and adjust per deliverable type. Consistent questions also make it possible to compare feedback across projects.
What if the feedback contradicts the brief?
The agent flags it against the original brief so the conflict surfaces before someone starts revising. That turns a scope question into a short conversation rather than a round of work that gets rejected for the wrong reason.
