A logic model your board can read and a funder will accept, drawn from a plain description of what your program actually does. Tell the app who you serve, what you do with them, and what you believe changes as a result, and Taskade Genesis maps inputs, activities, outputs, short and long-term outcomes, impact, assumptions, and external factors into one connected picture.
The app embedded on this page is Exhibit Flow, a real Taskade Genesis build that lays out a chain of connected stages you can expand and rearrange. Expand a branch, add a node, watch the structure hold, then clone it in about ten seconds and relabel that chain as the logic model described above.
The value is that the map is not a drawing, it is data. Each outcome carries the indicator that measures it, the data source, the collection method, the baseline, and the target. Each activity links to the outputs it produces and the resources it consumes. Linked records connect the model to your actual outcome tracking and to the grant proposals that promised those outcomes, so the theory and the evidence live in the same workspace instead of in a slide from 2023.
Workspace DNA keeps the model honest. Memory holds the model, the assumptions you wrote down, and the versions you have revised, so a change of staff does not reset your thinking. Intelligence, using 15+ frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and open-weight providers, challenges weak links, asks where an outcome's evidence would come from, and proposes indicators that are actually measurable with your capacity. Execution turns each indicator into a tracking field and a data-collection task.
Read the model in the layout that helps:
- Mind Map view, the whole chain from inputs to impact in one picture
- List view, the model as a readable narrative for a proposal appendix
- Table view, outcomes with indicators, baselines, targets, and data sources
- Board view, indicators grouped by whether you can currently measure them
- Plus Calendar, Gantt, and Org Chart across the 7 project views
Automations connect theory to practice. With Taskade automations, an approved indicator creates its tracking field and a recurring collection task, and a quarterly review opens a task to check whether the assumptions still hold. Across 100+ bidirectional integrations, Google Sheets pulls your existing data in while Slack pushes review prompts out to the program team.
The AI agents carry 34 built-in tools including web search, so an agent can find how comparable programs define an indicator and suggest a definition that a funder will recognize, rather than one you have to defend from scratch.
Clone it, invite your program team and your board's program committee, and the model, the indicators, and the revision history are yours.
Browse other builds in the Community Gallery, start fresh at Taskade Genesis, or learn the mind map layout in Learn. Turn the indicators into a live dashboard with track program outcomes against your targets, and reuse the model inside a grant proposal narrative.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a logic model and a theory of change?
A logic model lays out resources, activities, outputs, and outcomes in sequence. A theory of change adds the reasoning and the assumptions between each step. The app produces both from the same input, since funders ask for one or the other and sometimes both.
We have never written one. Is that a problem?
No. You describe the program in ordinary language and the app proposes the structure, then asks the questions that surface the gaps. Most first drafts take an afternoon rather than a consulting engagement.
Will it suggest indicators we cannot actually collect?
It proposes indicators and asks you to confirm the data source and collection method for each. Anything without a realistic source gets flagged so you either build the collection or drop the claim before it appears in a proposal.
Can we have different models for different programs?
Yes. Each program gets its own model, and a shared organizational theory of change can sit above them with the program models linked underneath.
Can the model be exported for a proposal?
Yes. The list view reads as narrative text for an appendix, and the mind map is the picture for the slide. Both come from the same underlying records, so they never disagree.
How often should we revisit it?
A quarterly assumption check and an annual revision is a reasonable rhythm for most small organizations. The app keeps prior versions so you can show a funder how your thinking evolved.
Does this help with evaluation as well as planning?
Yes, because the indicators become the fields you track. That link is what turns an evaluation from a scramble at report time into a number you already have.
