A complete proposal narrative drafted from the material you already have, shaped to the funder's questions and page limits. Upload your program description, last year's report, and the funder guidelines, and Taskade Genesis returns a structured draft: need statement, program description, goals and measurable objectives, methodology, evaluation plan, organizational capacity, and sustainability, each section sized to the limit.
The app embedded on this page is Exhibit Flow, a real Taskade Genesis build that holds a long piece of writing as an ordered set of sections. Open a section, change what it has to answer, watch the draft reshape, then clone it in about ten seconds and rename those sections into the proposal narrative described above.
The build is a working writing room, not a text box. Each section is its own item with the funder's exact question at the top, a word or character limit, the draft, the source documents it drew from, a reviewer, and a status. Linked records connect the narrative to the budget, the logic model, and the attachments, so the numbers in your text and the numbers in your budget stop disagreeing.
Workspace DNA is why the second proposal is faster than the first. Memory holds your boilerplate, your outcome data, your organizational history, and every narrative you have submitted, so common sections arrive already written and only need updating. Intelligence, powered by 15+ frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and open-weight providers, rewrites your material in the funder's language, keeps the claims tied to your actual data, and cuts to the page limit without gutting the argument. Execution routes each section to its reviewer and assembles the approved pieces into a single document.
Write and review in the layout that suits the stage:
- List view, the narrative in reading order for a full pass
- Board view, sections moving from drafted to reviewed to final
- Table view, section, word limit, current count, reviewer, and status
- Calendar view, internal deadlines mapped backwards from the submission date
- Plus Mind Map, Gantt, and Org Chart across the 7 project views
Automations move the draft along. With Taskade automations, a section marked ready notifies its reviewer in Slack, an approaching internal deadline escalates, and a final approval assembles the sections into one document ready for the portal. Across 100+ bidirectional integrations, Google Drive and Gmail pull source documents and funder correspondence in while Slack pushes review requests out.
The AI agents carry 34 built-in tools including file analysis and persistent memory, so an agent can read a 60-page evaluation report and pull out the three outcome figures that answer the funder's question, with the page reference attached.
Clone it, invite your program director and your executive director as reviewers, and every draft, every source, and every approved paragraph stays in your workspace for the next application.
Browse other builds in the Community Gallery, start fresh at Taskade Genesis, or learn how to give an agent source material in Learn. Pair this with the grant budget and narrative so the numbers match, and pull your outcome claims from track program outcomes against your targets.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does it write the proposal for us or with us?
With you. It produces a complete first draft from your own documents, which is the hardest part to start, and then you edit, correct, and add the judgment only your team has. Every claim traces back to a source you provided.
Will it make up outcome numbers?
It draws figures from the documents and records you give it and marks any place where it lacks evidence rather than filling the gap. Review those flags before you submit, since funders check.
Can it match a specific funder's tone?
Yes. Paste the guidelines and, if you have one, a proposal that funder previously approved. The agent matches vocabulary and emphasis, for example leading with community leadership rather than service delivery when that is what the funder rewards.
How does it handle strict word limits?
Each section carries its limit as a field and the draft is written to it, with a live count as you edit. Ask the agent to cut 15 percent and it removes hedging and repetition rather than evidence.
Can we reuse sections across applications?
Yes. Approved boilerplate is stored in the workspace and reused, then tailored per funder. Update your organizational history once and every future proposal starts from the current version.
What about attachments and required forms?
Track them as linked items with their own owners and statuses so the checklist and the narrative live in one place. The agent will tell you which attachments the guidelines require.
Does this work on the free plan?
You can draft with it. The free plan includes up to 6,000 one-time AI credits, 3 Taskade Genesis apps, and 1 agent. Multi-reviewer automations and additional agents need a paid plan.
