Live numbers against every outcome you promised, with a baseline, a target, a current figure, and a plain status. Describe your programs and the results you committed to, and Taskade Genesis builds the tracker: indicators, collection schedule, data owners, and a dashboard that answers "are we on track" without anyone rebuilding a spreadsheet the night before a board meeting.
The app embedded on this page is Analytics Dashboard, a real Taskade Genesis build that tracks figures against targets and shows the gap. Update a figure, watch the status change, open a metric, then clone it in about ten seconds and rename those metrics as the program indicators described above.
Each indicator record holds the outcome it measures, the definition in one sentence, the data source, the collection method and frequency, the person responsible, the baseline, the target, the current value, and the trend. Linked records connect indicators to the grants that promised them and to the program that produces them, so when a funder asks about a specific commitment you can trace it from the proposal to the number in one click.
Workspace DNA is why the numbers stay current. Memory holds every prior data point, so trend is real history rather than two points and an opinion. Intelligence, powered by 15+ frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and open-weight providers, spots indicators that have gone stale, explains a swing in plain language, and writes the paragraph you need for a report. Execution opens the collection task on schedule and nudges the owner when a figure is overdue.
See performance in whichever layout fits the audience:
- Table view, every indicator with baseline, target, current, and variance
- Board view, indicators grouped into on track, at risk, and off track
- Calendar view, the collection schedule across the quarter
- List view, a readable performance summary for a board packet
- Plus Mind Map, Gantt, and Org Chart across the 7 project views
Automations keep it from going stale. With Taskade automations, a collection date creates the task for its owner, an indicator with no update in a quarter flags to the program director in Slack, and an off-track status opens a short review task rather than waiting for the annual report. Across 100+ bidirectional integrations, Google Sheets and your form tool pull raw data in while Slack and email push the alerts and summaries out.
The AI agents carry 34 built-in tools including file analysis and persistent memory, so an agent can read a batch of surveys or attendance sheets and update the indicators, then draft the narrative explaining what moved and why.
Clone it, invite your program staff and your board's program committee, and the indicators, the history, and the definitions are yours.
Explore other builds in the Community Gallery, start a new one at Taskade Genesis, or learn dashboards in Learn. Define the indicators first with the logic model, collect the participant side through the program evaluation survey, and publish the results in the quarterly impact report.
Frequently Asked Questions
We do not have a baseline for some outcomes. Can we still start?
Yes. Record the first measurement as the baseline and note the date. The app tracks from there, and the honest framing "baseline established this quarter" is much better received than a number nobody can source.
Where does the data come from?
From wherever you already collect it: attendance sheets, surveys, case records, or a connected spreadsheet. The app is where definitions, targets, and history live, and it will tell you which indicators currently have no reliable source.
Can it show the same numbers in different formats for different funders?
Yes. One dataset, multiple views. A funder wanting quarterly counts and a board wanting year-over-year trend both read the same underlying figures without anyone recalculating.
What if an indicator is going the wrong way?
The status flips to off track and opens a review task. The agent will draft a candid explanation, which is usually what a funder relationship needs, since surprises at the final report are far more damaging than an early conversation.
Can we track outputs and outcomes separately?
Yes, and you should. Outputs count what you did and outcomes measure what changed. Keeping the distinction visible is one of the fastest ways to strengthen a proposal.
Does it work for qualitative results too?
Yes. Attach story records and coded themes alongside the numbers. Pair it with collect beneficiary stories so the quotes and the counts sit together.
How much staff time does this take to maintain?
Most small teams spend under an hour a month once the collection tasks are automated, because the work moves from reconstructing data at deadline to entering it as it arrives.
