
TSK-1 · DeepSeek · tested in Taskade Genesis
How DeepSeek builds in Taskade Genesis
Updated · Last measured
TSK-1 Score
Aggregated from hands-on Taskade Genesis builds · September 2026
- Interfaceready to share
- Leading
- Taskfollows your request
- Strong
- Memorykeeps your data
- Leading
- Adapthandles follow-up edits
- Emerging
Best for
Polished apps with rich workspace data
DeepSeek combines polished design with efficient builds. Flash produced the best-looking app in its test, while Pro created the richest workspace behind an app, including fields, saved data, and automations.
Model results
DeepSeek V4 FlashTested Aug 20265 findings
The cheapest model won the design test. It was the only one that looked right in both light and dark, ran without a single error, and laid out cleanly on a phone, for a fraction of what the others cost. On a real customer brief it was cheapest, fastest and cleanest at once.
Won on design: the only model that looked right in both light and dark, ran without a single error, and laid out cleanly on a 390px phone screen, at a fraction of the field's cost.
Won on design again, and this time the finished workspace saved real data with light and dark themes both working throughout.
Cheapest, fastest and cleanest run on the 32-question client sign-up form: 12 minutes 36 seconds.
Same test, same prompt: better value than Luna, at half the cost of the build.
Finished the tracker and made both follow-up changes cleanly, but its long-form build ran out of time.
DeepSeek V4 ProTested Aug 20264 findings
The workspace champion: a record 60 fields, 8 automations wired up, and all four builds word for word. It also won the tracker test as the cheapest app that actually opened, once two better-looking builds turned out not to open at all.
The richest workspace of the test: 8 automations, a record 60 fields, and all four builds word for word.
Won the tracker test as the most efficient app that opened. Two stronger-looking results could not be used, so they did not receive a score.
Went from none of its four builds matching the brief to all four word for word on a shorter prompt. The biggest jump we have measured in a single test.
The cheapest complete match tracker of the test.
App kits you can open today
Live apps from the official Taskade account, not builds by DeepSeek. Each is the same shape every benchmark request asks for: projects, agents, and automations you can open and clone.
Store command center OPSStore command center34 projects · 1 agent · 2 flowsInvoice tracker TOOLInvoice tracker1 project · 1 agent · 2 flowsProduct launch dashboard DASHBOARDProduct launch dashboard1 project · 1 agent · 1 flowOrder and stock tracker TRACKEROrder and stock tracker2 projects · 1 agent · 3 flowsHotel operations dashboard DASHBOARDHotel operations dashboard4 projects · 1 agent · 3 flowsNew-hire onboarding hub PORTALNew-hire onboarding hub4 projects · 1 agent · 3 flows
Compare DeepSeek
FAQ
What is DeepSeek best at in Taskade Genesis?
DeepSeek is strongest on value and workspace depth. Flash won the design test outright and was the most efficient model on a real customer brief. Pro builds the richest workspace we have measured, with a record 60 fields, and won the tracker test as the most efficient app that actually opened.
Flash or Pro?
Flash for speed and design: it won the visual test while staying efficient. Pro for depth: it created the most fields and automations behind an app. Both are available in Taskade Genesis.
Are DeepSeek models open source?
DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pro are available in Taskade. They are open-weight models, meaning their underlying model weights are published rather than kept entirely private. Taskade supports 15+ frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and open-weight providers.




