TSK-1 · Anthropic · tested in Taskade Genesis
How Claude builds in Taskade Genesis
Updated · Last measured
TSK-1 Score
Aggregated from hands-on Taskade Genesis builds · September 2026
- Interfaceready to share
- Strong
- Taskfollows your request
- Strong
- Memorykeeps your data
- Strong
- Adapthandles follow-up edits
- Leading
Best for
Polished apps that keep improving
Claude produces the most polished finished apps we test and handles follow-up changes especially well. Its main risk is losing details in a long request.
Model results
Claude Sonnet 5Tested Aug 20265 findings
Our most carefully finished result. It checked its own app, but can miss details in long requests.
Opened its own app and checked the assistant's answers — the only model to verify its work this way.
Most carefully finished result, with eight minor items left.
Built a contacts database instead of the requested sign-up form after two stalls.
Four attempts stalled before the sign-up form was completed.
Stopped after asking its questions on the client sign-up form, and wrote the plan instead of the app.
Claude Opus 5Tested Aug 20264 findings
Our best-looking result, with a complete workspace and an assistant that understood its contents.
Set the design high-water mark with a polished, consistent interface.
Created the fullest workspace, with an assistant that understood its contents.
The most complete client sign-up build of the test: a five-page form, every answer saved, and the scoring automation graded the submission on its own.
Best-executed match tracker of the test, without a single failed build action, at by far the highest cost.
Claude Haiku 4.5Tested Aug 20262 findings
Caught and repaired a problem that would have left the app blank.
Found the problem while building, repaired it, and then finished — the only model in the test to recover on its own.
Fastest build of the test, but it left out the weekly recap automation the brief asked for.
App kits you can open today
Live apps from the official Taskade account, not builds by Claude. Each is the same shape every benchmark request asks for: projects, agents, and automations you can open and clone.
- CRMLead pipeline tracker4 projects · 2 agents · 3 flows
- DASHBOARDInvestor metrics dashboard5 projects · 2 agents · 4 flows
- CRMClient pipeline CRM2 projects · 1 agent · 2 flows
- OPSStore command center34 projects · 1 agent · 2 flows
- TOOLInvoice tracker1 project · 1 agent · 2 flows
- DASHBOARDProduct launch dashboard1 project · 1 agent · 1 flow
Compare Claude
FAQ
What is Claude best at in Taskade Genesis?
Claude is strongest when finish and follow-up changes matter. Sonnet produced our most carefully finished result, while Opus set the visual quality high-water mark. With long requests, review the finished app to make sure every detail carried through.
Sonnet or Opus for app building?
Sonnet 5 is the stronger all-round choice. It checked its own finished app and handled changes especially well. Opus 5 is the visual quality leader when the final finish matters most.
Why did Claude fail a test?
In one August test it built a contacts database instead of the client sign-up form, after two three-minute stalls lost it the thread. In another, four stalled runs in a row meant the client sign-up form never got built at all. We publish the tests that go badly alongside the ones that go well, and we open every app and read it back against the brief. That is the point of the benchmark.
Can I use Claude in Taskade?
Yes. Claude Sonnet 5, Opus 5, and Haiku 4.5 are all available in Taskade. Taskade offers 15+ frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and open-weight providers.