download dots

🎯 Compare Estimated Hours With Actual

Capture the hours your team actually works, approve them without a Friday scramble, and see utilization before the month closes. These time tracking prompts build the layer between the work and the invoice: entries against projects, approvals with an owner, budget burn per project, and reminders that arrive before the timesheet is late. Built for agencies, studios, and service teams who bill for their time and want the numbers to be true.
  • Tested prompts
  • Edit for your use case
  • Works across models
  • Save in Taskade
Compare Estimated Hours With Actual

Copy

We estimate work and are always wrong in the same direction, but we never learn from it. Build me an estimate accuracy app. For every completed piece of work, record the original estimated hours, who estimated it, the work type, and the actual hours recorded against it. Calculate the variance in hours and as a percentage. Report accuracy by work type, by estimator, by client and by job size, since the bias is rarely uniform, and show whether it is improving over time. From that history, derive a correction factor per work type that can be applied to new estimates, based on evidence rather than adding a round contingency. Add an AI agent that, given a new piece of work, finds the most similar completed jobs, tells me what they actually took, and suggests a realistic estimate with the reasoning, and that tells me which work types I most consistently underestimate. Automate two things: a prompt to review accuracy whenever a job is completed, and a scheduled monthly accuracy report shared with the team, since estimating improves fastest when everyone can see the pattern. Two logins: an estimator who sees their own accuracy, and an owner who sees everyone.

STATUS · LIVE
v1

01 / Spark - intelligence awakens

Compare Estimated Hours With Actual

Compare estimated against actual hours by work type and estimator, derive a correction factor, and improve future estimates.

// the spark catches · intelligence awakens · the answer unfolds

Estimates never improve because nobody compares them to reality. This measures the gap by work type and by estimator, so the next estimate is corrected by evidence.

What's Included

  • Estimated against actual on every completed piece of work.
  • Accuracy by work type because the bias is rarely uniform.
  • A correction factor derived from your own history.
  • An assistant that suggests a realistic estimate.

How To Use

  1. Compare every completed job, not just the ones that went wrong.
  2. Break accuracy down by work type. The bias is rarely the same everywhere.
  3. Apply a correction factor from evidence rather than adding a round margin.
  4. Share the results. Estimating improves fastest when people see the pattern.

Feed the estimates from the labour cost estimator, and the actuals from job time costing.