Risk judged case by case is judged inconsistently. A standard assessment makes decisions comparable, and comparable decisions are the ones you can defend.
What's Included
- A standard question set applied to every proposal.
- Risk from impact and likelihood rather than a single impression.
- Controls recorded against risks so approval has conditions.
- An assistant that drafts the assessment and names the real risk.
How To Use
- Use the same questions every time. Consistency is what makes it defensible.
- Assess impact and likelihood separately, then combine them.
- Attach controls to approvals. An approval without conditions is a gamble.
- Reassess when the use case changes, not only at first approval.
Submit through the governance office, and check it against the policy register.